Chatham County Online BBS
February 09, 2010, 07:46:26 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Read the latest Chatham news at Chatham Journal
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Tags Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: President Obama bowing to Emperor  (Read 870 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« on: November 14, 2009, 09:53:13 AM »

Unfortunately, IMO, this puts the question to rest wether or not our President was bowing to the Saudi King.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6567670/Barack-Obama-bows-and-talks-of-green-tea-icecream-as-he-pushes-US-ties-in-Asia.html




Dave Jaeger
« Last Edit: November 14, 2009, 11:03:43 AM by CalUCD » Logged
NC YIPPIE
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 06:41:47 AM
Date Registerd:February 09, 2006, 03:52:41 PM
Posts: 3860



« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2009, 10:26:53 AM »

Do you actually think this is a legitimate issue or concern?
Logged

"Sarah Palin would make better president than Barack Obama.  http://www.sarahpac.com/"

"Year by year the relentless temper of war is giving way to the gentle tones of brotherhood and peace." - Col. John Randolph Lane, Chatham
chrstnhsbndfthr
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 12:38:00 AM
Date Registerd:February 20, 2006, 11:25:33 PM
Posts: 6438



« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2009, 10:41:17 AM »

Several interesting points.  After all the shrill denials and spin about last time, it turns out that yes, he does bow to foreign Kings and Emperors.

If there is a legitimate diplomatic reason to do this, why not just start there? Why do they have to go through all the denials and attacks and spin first?

It speaks to integrity and world-view, both of which are legitimate issues to discuss about our President.  Remember that our Presidents have been, up to now anyway, referred to as "the leader of the free world!" Who looks like they are in charge when he is bowing to these foreign leaders?  And how does it makes his followers feel to KNOW now that they were fooled when they were denying he bows to foreign leaders?
Logged

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." — Patrick Henry, first governor of Virginia
belle
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 12:03:52 AM
Date Registerd:December 11, 2007, 09:17:56 AM
Posts: 9142


« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2009, 10:48:09 AM »

forget the bow, I think that is protocol. he has aides who figure that out.




just check out the garment the Empress has on. amazing.
Logged

Nac mac Feegle!
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2009, 10:52:14 AM »

Do you actually think this is a legitimate issue or concern?

Yes, from what I understand this is an inappropriate gesture.  I believe, in Japan, according to Shinto teachings, the body is divided into three zones.  From the shoulders up represents heaven.  When bowing, it is appropriate to offer the highest of the body in respect, the heaven aspect.  Akihito Samma is not even bowing at all.  This shows he does not respect the President, or he is surprised.  Another possibility is the still shot did not capture this.

However, it is appropriate to bow at the same angle and duration of the host, when equals are addressing one another.  The key is the Empress.  She is not bowing at all.  In other words, our President either ignored his advisors on cultural ettiquette or he "winged it".

I think it's an issue because he is either prostrating himself to another or is showing disrespect by not understanding the cultural and diplomatic implications of his actions.  Additionaly, if he was going to bow he should have shaken hands first, and then bowed with his hands on his upper thighs.

Additionally, to some of us in the U.S.A., Presidents should not humble themselves in this manner, ever.  Even if done accurately, it is never appropriate.  He is not a private individual.  He is the representative of the United States of America.  He represents not just the people.  He represents the concept as well.  He diminishes both when he, IMHO, behaves this boorishly.

Dave Jaeger
Logged
Beel
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:February 04, 2010, 02:14:59 PM
Date Registerd:October 18, 2006, 03:24:26 PM
Posts: 3755


« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2009, 11:26:59 AM »

At least he ain't holding hands with some Saudi prince. 
Logged
Claude Bowles
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Yesterday at 09:52:36 PM
Date Registerd:January 30, 2009, 09:51:33 PM
Posts: 1370


« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2009, 11:28:21 AM »

.Or massaging the neck of a female head of state
Logged

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped . . . Elbert Hubbard
NC YIPPIE
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 06:41:47 AM
Date Registerd:February 09, 2006, 03:52:41 PM
Posts: 3860



« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2009, 11:34:24 AM »

Ok, fair enough. I think you are way off the deep end in terms of your analysis of the significance of this gesture either way. It strikes me as a teeny, tiny, miniscule concern in a world of great change and tragedy.

Much more important than trivial concerns and speculation about cultural etiquette are the results of these meetings and his overall foreign policy with these countries.

But I could see how this would upset some people.
Logged

"Sarah Palin would make better president than Barack Obama.  http://www.sarahpac.com/"

"Year by year the relentless temper of war is giving way to the gentle tones of brotherhood and peace." - Col. John Randolph Lane, Chatham
bluetick67
Chathameister
****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Yesterday at 11:07:18 PM
Date Registerd:June 11, 2009, 01:33:40 PM
Posts: 735


« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2009, 11:35:18 AM »

.Or massaging the neck of a female head of state

Ah, beat me to it.

George Bush --> Angela Merkel (note: only using Bush as an example because it's the most publicized similar gaffe I could think of....)

If Obama's interpretation of the proper bow was incorrect, he most likely knows, now, and won't make the mistake again (in Japan).
Logged

"Word begets Image and Image is Virus". -WS Burroughs
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2009, 11:42:58 AM »

At least he ain't holding hands with some Saudi prince. 

From what I remember about that visit by the Saudi King. President Bush kissed both of his cheeks and held his right hand.  Neither gesture was culturally inappropriate.  Both in diplomatic and business environments neither of those activities is considered awkward nor do they define a hierarchal relationship.  They are greetings accorded to diplomatic/business equals.

However, it certainly could be argued as to wether or not a President should relate to or negotiate with any particular world leader.  But in this case the behavior was neither that of a supplicant or culturally ignorant.

Unfortunately, President Obama's humbling of himself and the office or gaffe, has occured at the beginning of an important diplomatic trip.  His gesture will not go unnoticed by those in asia who pay attention to such subtleties.

Dave Jaeger
Logged
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2009, 11:49:41 AM »

Ok, fair enough. I think you are way off the deep end in terms of your analysis of the significance of this gesture either way. It strikes me as a teeny, tiny, miniscule concern in a world of great change and tragedy.

Much more important than trivial concerns and speculation about cultural etiquette are the results of these meetings and his overall foreign policy with these countries.

But I could see how this would upset some people.

Interesting, that you consider this observation "off the deep end".  Is this how you usually engage in friendly discourse?

I believe that, as you say, "trivial concerns and speculation about cultural etiquette" do, in fact, impact the results of these meetings.  If not, then, diplomatic protocol would not be as detailed and focused on subtlety as it is.

Why would I be upset?  Because I posted something?  Interesting.

Dave Jaeger
Logged
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2009, 11:59:01 AM »

.Or massaging the neck of a female head of state

Inappropriate behavior for President Bush.  I think I'm confused.  What does this have to do with President Obama bowing to a King and an Emperor?  Are observations of President Obama's diplomatic behavior going to be met with well, Bush did this .....?

Oh well.

Dave Jaeger
Logged
chathamshooter
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Yesterday at 10:40:31 PM
Date Registerd:September 19, 2006, 07:13:55 PM
Posts: 1040



« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2009, 12:54:48 PM »

From what I remember about that visit by the Saudi King. President Bush kissed both of his cheeks and held his right hand.  
Dave Jaeger

I think they wipe themselves with their right hand w/o TP.
Logged

"And I believe that what Americans are seeking is not the elitism, the kind of a spinelessness that perhaps is made up for that with some kind of elite Ivy League education and a fact resume that's based on anything but hard work and private sector, free enterprise principles."

Caribou Barbie
CalUCD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 20, 2009, 08:46:41 AM
Date Registerd:December 22, 2007, 06:34:49 PM
Posts: 94


« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2009, 01:03:56 PM »

From what I remember about that visit by the Saudi King. President Bush kissed both of his cheeks and held his right hand.  
Dave Jaeger

I think they wipe themselves with their right hand w/o TP.

From Wikipedia,

Among Muslims, the left hand is reserved for bodily hygiene and considered unclean. Thus, the right hand should be used for eating. Shaking hands or handing over an item with one's left hand is an insult.[2
Logged
bobsyouruncle
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:January 06, 2010, 12:30:52 AM
Date Registerd:July 24, 2006, 10:06:04 PM
Posts: 2149


« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2009, 01:21:29 PM »

At least he ain't holding hands with some Saudi prince. 

From what I remember about that visit by the Saudi King. President Bush kissed both of his cheeks and held his right hand.  Neither gesture was culturally inappropriate.  

That's a real true "your cat's fat/ my cat's fluffy" argument if I ever heard it.  If it's appropriate to adopt the other person's culture-- and kissing and holding hands was correct protocol because the prince was Saudi, then bowing to the emperor was correct protocol as a gesture of respect to the emperor in Japan.

But if the gesture is judged by our standards and you complain that in our eyes Obama was being submissive, then Bush and the Saudi prince were making out.
Logged

Just enjoy your ice cream while it's on your plate--that's my philosophy.          Thornton Wilder
Chatham County Online BBS
   

 Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  






Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!